Why stock selection *is* important

Trader Mike had linked to an interesting post by Taz Trader as to why he/she lists no stock picks. But, I have to disagree (as a stock picker) with Taz Trader's lead point; if one is to apply the lessons of Technical analysis, one needs to offer the best opportunities at the lowest risk - this can't be done using hindsight, it has to be done in the here and now with real examples. By suggesting stocks one is offering a marker from which one can be measured by.

At its simplest; one can't trade words.
1. Designed To Dazzle!
Stock picks are designed to impress people with there "ability to predict what a stock is going to do". Sorry, but I can't predict what stocks will do - so I wouldn't impress you.

When you visit these "stock picking" sites, they always tell you which ones have made enormous gains. They don't tell you about the losses.

Sorry folks, but that is disingenuous at best. Just ONE TIME I would love to go on one of these sites and see all their most recent losses in a big flashing neon red box right on the homepage!

Now that is a stock picking service that I would recommend.

Well Taz, my average gains are losses, per trade, for each month, for all of my 2,900 stock picks (and counting) are available on the index page of my homepage and have been since June 2004.



Now - I don't expect anyone to trade all 2,900 stocks, that is why I have my Collective2 portfolio which is a sample portfolio based on stocks drawn from my blog and website:




But, I doubt I will be getting Taz Trader's recommendation any time soon...

Which brings me to my second point:

In May of this year I mailed out this to my Newsletter Subscribers. My bullish thesis at the time was based on (three) occassions when my Breakout scan (momentum stock picks, listed here for free) failed to generate any stock picks for a period of a few days and tech market internals were oversold. Subsequent Breakout picks from this time, for a period of 2-3 months after this 'low', performed very strongly.

I have highlighted the periods on the newsletter returns when I have been bullish the market (green highlight, based on the aforementioned factors), bearish the market (red highlight, when market internals were overbought), or neutral (cash favored, falling from overbought conditions, but not qualifying as oversold).



I was confident this summer would have followed the same pattern, but those strong momentum plays never appeared as the old rally stalwarts like stocks in the energy sector continued to dominate. The failure of new leadership to emerge during this period is a concern for the health of the rally and may signal a much greater malaise which could express itself on the next leg down. With Small caps and Techs struggling to challenge summer highs, and market internals overbought, it could be an ugly few months ahead. Better periods to buy will emerge, but I am opting for the bearish side of the fence. This is no time to be brave.

I got it wrong in May, will it be second time (un)lucky?

Popular posts from this blog

Friday's gap downs bring indices close to support. Semiconductor Index at 200-day MA.

Image
Friday's big gaps lower have the potential to become breakdown gaps, but for now, the near term oversell has for a possible move into the gap price vacuum. The index most likely to achieve this in the coming days is the Russell 2000 ($IWM). The Russell 2000 ($IWM) finished with a neutral doji, just above its 50-day MA and in a thick band of support between $207.50 and $210 marked by the summer swing highs. Technicals have followed price action with new 'sell' triggers in On-Balance-Volume and ADX, but intermediate term stochastics haven't reached the mid-line that is typical support in bull markets. Aggressive bulls can look for a move to test the underside of the 20-day MA. The S&P was unable to hold its 50-day MA on Friday's open, and instead found itself toying with the May swing high. More significant support is likely to be found around 5,265, so if there is an undercut of Friday's low then this will be the next port of call. More concer...
Read more

Upcoming "Death Cross" for Russell 2000 ($IWM)

Image
There was some modest buying today from the open, but volume was light and markets are below trading range support established during the latter part of 2024. It's hard to see where the buyers are going to come from given the chaos of Trump. I should add, I listened to Josh Brown's The Compound podcast and he showed an interesting chart of market returns in April-May in the year following a strong return in markets; in essence, selling to pay capital gains tax. Given the precarious nature of markets, and the possibility for this seasonal factor to play out, it's likely we have a couple more months of downward action before value buyers return. If we look at individual markets, the Russell 2000 ($IWM) is looking like the first to signal a long term shift in favor of bears with an upcoming "Death Cross" between the 50-day MA and 200-day MA - perhaps completing before the end of the week. Technicals are net bearish and the volume trend has collapsed since the st...
Read more

"Dead Cat" Bounce or Something Better?

Image
It's still a little too early to say, but the bounce is in play and "long" is the place to be. There is a huge amount of overhead resistance and the risk:reward remains tight with moves back to Thursday's lows well within expectations. For the S&P, I would be looking for a rally back to test the 200-day MA, or a fast-falling 20-day MA, whichever is the lowest. Real supply won't kick in until 5,700 is tested, and maybe it will have the juice to get to 5,775 before volume selling makes its presence felt. As the index makes this move I expect to see a decent On-Balance-Volume 'buy' signal, alongside what will be a weak MACD 'buy'; other technicals are likely to remain bearish.
Read more

Archive

Show more